<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;How Do I Go on Without ImageReady?!&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HR Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-169508</link>
		<dc:creator>HR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-169508</guid>
		<description>I agree with bocman1. I loved the splicing that imageready offered. Now I just do everything manually because it is easier for me and I can usually optimize it much better for loading times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with bocman1. I loved the splicing that imageready offered. Now I just do everything manually because it is easier for me and I can usually optimize it much better for loading times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bocman1</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-164988</link>
		<dc:creator>bocman1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-164988</guid>
		<description>Ideally, Photoshop should be used for what it was made for…photos. It’s not really a design slicing tool although it could be used that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ideally, Photoshop should be used for what it was made for…photos. It’s not really a design slicing tool although it could be used that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-25478</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-25478</guid>
		<description>Sorry, there is one major disadvantage to Photshop CS3. That is the fact that the animation belons to the whole document rather than a layer comp (or obviously a rollover state). So if you like animated rollovers, be prepared to output a second time for your normal state after deleting the aimation.  ImageReady could have an animation belonging only to the over state. Why didn't Photoshop have animations belonging to layer comps (the ability to turn the animation off with a visbility icon for example). Oversight? I think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, there is one major disadvantage to Photshop CS3. That is the fact that the animation belons to the whole document rather than a layer comp (or obviously a rollover state). So if you like animated rollovers, be prepared to output a second time for your normal state after deleting the aimation.  ImageReady could have an animation belonging only to the over state. Why didn&#8217;t Photoshop have animations belonging to layer comps (the ability to turn the animation off with a visbility icon for example). Oversight? I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco van de Meulenhof</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-9765</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco van de Meulenhof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-9765</guid>
		<description>I am very sad they pulled the plug out of Image Ready. I am a web designer for 12 years now and really love the combination PS CS2 and IR CS2. Really easy to set-up the basic design elements, it can be done in minutes (when the design is finished of course). The auto slicing and roll over tool that's what I really need. If I try to do the same in photoshop CS3 with FW CS3 then it will take a lot more time. Maybe I have to get used to it? I don't know....

Rest in peace Image Ready...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very sad they pulled the plug out of Image Ready. I am a web designer for 12 years now and really love the combination PS CS2 and IR CS2. Really easy to set-up the basic design elements, it can be done in minutes (when the design is finished of course). The auto slicing and roll over tool that&#8217;s what I really need. If I try to do the same in photoshop CS3 with FW CS3 then it will take a lot more time. Maybe I have to get used to it? I don&#8217;t know&#8230;.</p>
<p>Rest in peace Image Ready&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeppe</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-8031</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeppe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-8031</guid>
		<description>Try this (this is how i was able to open an animated gif into photoshop, with the animation frames):

File &gt; Import &gt; Video Frames to Layers...

In the file dialog, put *.* to filename and press enter, that should show all files, not just the extensions selected in filetype-selection. Then just double-click the gif file, and it should open.

works for windows atleast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try this (this is how i was able to open an animated gif into photoshop, with the animation frames):</p>
<p>File &gt; Import &gt; Video Frames to Layers&#8230;</p>
<p>In the file dialog, put *.* to filename and press enter, that should show all files, not just the extensions selected in filetype-selection. Then just double-click the gif file, and it should open.</p>
<p>works for windows atleast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara MacKay</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-7881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara MacKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 23:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-7881</guid>
		<description>Very true!  In fact, the ImageReady two-feather icon can still be seen at the top of the Save for Web dialog in Photoshop CS3!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true!  In fact, the ImageReady two-feather icon can still be seen at the top of the Save for Web dialog in Photoshop CS3!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madking</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-7693</link>
		<dc:creator>madking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 21:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-7693</guid>
		<description>"save for web and devices" in PSCS3 is practically the same thing as Image Ready when it comes to optimizing imagery
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;save for web and devices&#8221; in PSCS3 is practically the same thing as Image Ready when it comes to optimizing imagery<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara MacKay</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-7683</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara MacKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-7683</guid>
		<description>I totally agree, though I think for a lot of non-Web designers who only need the occasional Web design task, ImageReady was a nice option (and a free one with the cost of Photoshop).  I think I'll like Fireworks much better next time they do an update and get it into the look and feel of other Adobe products, and provide the ability to jump between the two apps easily.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, though I think for a lot of non-Web designers who only need the occasional Web design task, ImageReady was a nice option (and a free one with the cost of Photoshop).  I think I&#8217;ll like Fireworks much better next time they do an update and get it into the look and feel of other Adobe products, and provide the ability to jump between the two apps easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosa</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/inspiration/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/comment-page-1/#comment-7673</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/design/how-do-i-go-on-without-imageready/#comment-7673</guid>
		<description>Fireworks is definitely the way to go. Much more powerful and useful than ImageReady ever was in my opinion.

Ideally, Photoshop should be used for what it was made for...photos. It's not really a design slicing tool although it could be used that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fireworks is definitely the way to go. Much more powerful and useful than ImageReady ever was in my opinion.</p>
<p>Ideally, Photoshop should be used for what it was made for&#8230;photos. It&#8217;s not really a design slicing tool although it could be used that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
