Ten Copyright Myths That Can Hurt You

Author of this post: Jean Perwin | About Blog Authors »

copyright2.jpg

1. “You don’t have to put copyright notices on your work anymore.” This myth arose because of the amendments to the Copyright law after the US became a member of the Berne Convention, the international copyright treaty. In Berne countries, copyright notices are not required. When a country becomes a member of the Berne Convention, it may not require notices as a condition of copyright ownership, and as of 1992, the US does not either. HOWEVER, this does not mean that you should leave copyright notices off your work. If you do, it will not damage your claim to your copyright or allow it to fall into the public domain. But, it will allow an infringer to claim that he or she was an innocent infringer and eliminate any damages you may have as a result of the infringement.

2. “If a client hires me to do design work it is automatically work-for-hire” Prior to 1991, freelancers had a difficult time showing that work that they were hired to do belonged to them. There was a presumption that freelance work was mostly work-for-hire, which means the copyright is owned by the employer. In 1991, however, the Supreme Court in the Feist case changed that presumption, and now freelance work is presumed NOT to be work-for-hire, unless there is an agreement in writing which says that it is.

3. “A Client who buys design work from me can do whatever she wants with it” As the creator of a design or artwork or photography, you own the copyright in that work unless you transfer it in writing. That means YOU control the right the reproduce it, to change it and make new works out of it, to use it in a different media form—not the client. Clients often believe that buying “work” means buying “rights”. It doesn’t.

4. “All I have to do to protect my copyright rights is mail myself a copy of my work” I don’t go anywhere where someone doesn’t tell me, “I don’t have to worry about registering my copyright, I mailed myself a copy”. Mailing yourself a copy of your work does not protect your copyright, it does not take the place of registration and it should not give you piece of mind. It does nothing for you except allow you to prove the date that it was mailed—which is not a very useful piece of evidence. And it costs 41¢. Don’t do it. Register your copyright on a VA form available at copyright.gov.

5. “Everything on the Internet is public domain” The issue of how to protect copyrights in cyperspace is a fascinating and difficult one. But it is not true that you can freely use anything you find online. The cases have now made it clear that the opposite is true. The courts have consistently held that even though it’s easier to copy things online, if the copying is unauthorized it is still copying, and still copyright infringement.

6. “If I change someone’s design just a little but, I can use it with no problem” If you want to copy someone else’s work, you’d better change it a lot if you want to avoid copyright problems. The standard for determining whether something constitutes infringement is whether the copy is substantially similar to the original. If someone’s design is in blue and you change it to orange, or if a figure is on the right and you change it to the left, it is still likely to be found to be substantially similar and constitute infringement.

7. “A Copyright license must be in writing” An exclusive license must be in writing. But, a non-exclusive license can be transferred orally.

8. “The client automatically owns the digital files” The client only owns the files if you agree to sell or transfer them to him. What he owns is the right to use what is in the files for a limited, specified purpose. If he wants the files and the rights to make changes to it, the price should be higher.

9. “You don’t need permission to use artwork you have created in your own portfolio” In the past, there was some consensus that portfolio use was fair use of the work. But that is no longer true. If you are an employee, you need permission from your employer to use your own work in a portfolio. If you transferred all rights to a client, you need their permission to use your work in a portfolio.

10. “If someone copues my work, my damages might be so low that it is not worth doing anything about” The copyright law has built into it a solution to the problem of minimal damages, or damages that are difficult to prove. They are called statutory damages. These are damages that you do not have to prove, which the law says you are entitled to if you prove copyright infringement. They range from $750-$40,000 per infringement and they are available if you register your copyright within three months of publication—or making it public. While copyright litigation is long, expensive and frustrating, and not to be undertaken lightly, very often it is worth it.

4 Responses to “Ten Copyright Myths That Can Hurt You”

  1. Jnoathan Bailey Says:

    First off, great article! I’m glad to see that you’re drawing attention to a lot of very dangerous and very real myths. Thank you for that.

    It seems a bit unfair, to me, to call number one a myth since it is legally true. Though you point out that fact and explain why it is still a good idea to put copyright notices on work, it would seem to me that the myth would be “copyright notices have no use.”

    Also, with number one, it is worth talking about Copyright Management Information or CMI as the DMCA makes it illegal to remove or provide false CMI information. That is a separate tort from copyright infringement and can be worth up to $25,000 per infirngement.

    Second, with the last myth, it is worth noting that you have to register your work with the US Copyright Office before you can sue in a Federal court for statutory damages and you can only earn statutory damages for infringement that occurred AFTER the registration.

    That is something that separates the US from other countries, perhaps not for the best.

    Thank you again for this article! It deals with some much-needed myths!

  2. Carolyn E. Wright Says:

    Statutory damages range from $750 - $30,000 (not $40K) and up to $150,000 per infringement if willful. If the infringement is proven to be “innocent” (one factor can be that the copyright notice was not used), the damages can be reduced to $200.

    You are eligible for statutory damages if you register before the infringement or within 3 months of publication.

    If not eligible for statutory damages, you are entitled to actual damages for infringement. This usually is the normal license fee plus profits made from the infringement (that may be difficult to prove). Sometimes, however, actual damages can be significant. I represent photographers in copyright infringement cases all of the time and recover actual damages for them.

  3. RICHARD Says:

    I SAW THIS EXACT INFO ON ANOTHER WEBSITE. WORD FOR WORD.

  4. photographer Says:

    Great article,but may not be valid for many countries. We just need to educate others on these issues. In our online age,seems like it’s becoming very common to steal other’s work. And companies like Flickr only make it workse,by allowing their clients to use any images from the website(read the agreement).

    cheers,
    Dmitri

Leave a Reply

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
image 1
Who Cares?
June 12th, 2008
Inspiration Design