<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick &#038; Easy Usability Tests for Designers, Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notesondesign.net/resources/web-design/quick-easy-usability-tests-for-designers-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/resources/web-design/quick-easy-usability-tests-for-designers-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sandra Niehaus</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/resources/web-design/quick-easy-usability-tests-for-designers-part-2/#comment-122736</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandra Niehaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/web-design/quick-easy-usability-tests-for-designers-part-2/#comment-122736</guid>
		<description>Hey there,
I get what you mean about participant focus, and I agree that video recording of tests can be very helpful. 

For this and other tests, I've found that the way I prepare and interact with the participants can significantly help with their focus - and of course being sure to control the environment so there are as few distractions as possible. And another thing - participant selection. You want participants who, whatever their other demographics and characteristics - are able to voice their reactions clearly enough to be useful. So the recruitment process should include some filtering for that capability as well.

I'd be interested to hear how this works for you,
--Sandra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there,<br />
I get what you mean about participant focus, and I agree that video recording of tests can be very helpful. </p>
<p>For this and other tests, I&#8217;ve found that the way I prepare and interact with the participants can significantly help with their focus - and of course being sure to control the environment so there are as few distractions as possible. And another thing - participant selection. You want participants who, whatever their other demographics and characteristics - are able to voice their reactions clearly enough to be useful. So the recruitment process should include some filtering for that capability as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to hear how this works for you,<br />
&#8211;Sandra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Design Elixirs</title>
		<link>http://www.NotesOnDesign.net/resources/web-design/quick-easy-usability-tests-for-designers-part-2/#comment-122719</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Design Elixirs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notesondesign.net/web-design/quick-easy-usability-tests-for-designers-part-2/#comment-122719</guid>
		<description>WOW.  Most of the participants I have worked with are more A.D.D. than that!.  We are screen recording (and voice recording) our testing to preserve the process and lessen the written requirements for the participants.

We are still working to hone in matching usability testing with niche target audience.

I think I will try some written forms like you suggest to see if the process works better.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW.  Most of the participants I have worked with are more A.D.D. than that!.  We are screen recording (and voice recording) our testing to preserve the process and lessen the written requirements for the participants.</p>
<p>We are still working to hone in matching usability testing with niche target audience.</p>
<p>I think I will try some written forms like you suggest to see if the process works better.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
